Dr. Hildegarde Staninger Interviews Curtis Bennett on Wireless Exposure, Wi-Fi, Smart Meters & Professional Liability

As a Doctor of Integrative Medicine and published Industrial Toxicologist, Dr. Staninger interest in RF EMFs and wireless use is relevant to all of us. The scope of toxicity on global health is complex enough without throwing blanket electromagnetic radiation into medical diagnosis.

Health Canada uses the same science standards for exposure to RF EMFs and admits RF EMFs triggered nerves which is to be avoided. Dr. William Bailey of the Exponent Group admitted under cross examination that the nervous, hormonal and immune systems work together. Bailey also agreed for people to be hurt by RF EMF, they have to be exposed to the RF EMFs. That means you have to be hit by these electromagnetic fields to be hurt.

Citizens and professionals report extensive studies of harm and government and industries report there is no peer reviewed science showing RF EMF interaction causes adverse health effects. Once peer reviewed science is presented showing harm, code will be adjusted as deemed necessary says Health Canada’s Safety Code 6.

Health Canada’s Safety Code 6 related to human exposure is presently being revised and that will affect the whole world’s exposure considerations. Causation and Biological plausibility linking RF EMFs to adverse health effects was reported to Health Canada September 14, 2010 and by expert witness at the request of Canadian Parliament’s Standing Committee on Health October 26, 2010. Following that causation was qualified and then lectured in medical education for continuing medical education credits required for ongoing medical licensing January, 2011. That makes the dangers of RF EMFs as applied accepted medical education now and applicable internationally. The scope of medical diagnosis has changed, medicine, unions and insurers weren’t informed or consulted yet.

Dr. Hilde interviews Chief Science Officer Curtis Bennett on causation linking the frequencies to adverse health effects, building and infrastructure corrosion, ecocide as well as real liabilities. Sciences are supposed to compliment each other and professionals don’t speak beyond their areas of expertise. The interview is not scripted and important to all sciences and academia. Ecocide isn’t insurable.

Listen to this in your capacity whatever that may be, science and law has changed. This is being reposted because of the significance in the real liability. The Specific Absorption Rate test used for limits of human exposure left of the antennas, routers, smart grid and bio electrical information required for the trillions of complex electrical equations. Dr. Hildegarde Staninger Interviews Curtis Bennett on RF EMF Exposure & Professional Liability