Specific Absorption Rate on Wireless Exposure Garbage Science on Safety

It is critically important EVERY person, EVERY type of professional listen to and share this. It is not a singular opinion on the dangers of these frequencies as applied. It is reported there has not been one peer reviewed study showing adverse health effects with wireless or EMF exposure. The Specific Absorption Rate is the test adopted by Canada, FCC and other governing bodies for the limits of human exposure. Here is a picture of a model used for the Specific Absorption Rate so you can see why science linking adverse health effects missed critical data on your radiation dosage. Keep in mind exposure codes admit mechanisms missing that link EMFs to adverse health effects.

The white arrow shows the hole in the top of the head where they pour water and the black wire is a temperature probe to measure any heating of the water. The red arrow shows the cellphone and manufacturers have to submit their phones for testing. Wi-Fi and smart meters were determined to be safe for 24/7 radiation exposure because the laptop, tablet or meter weren’t held against the head like the cell phone.

Can you see the brain, neurological system, cells, eyes, ears, heart, organs, ovaries, eggs, testicles, legs, arms, etc? They aren’t included, the Specific Absorption Rate only considered if the electromagnetic RADIATION was heating water molecules.

Here is the link to the SAR test and you can see they left out ALL the bio-electrical information of the body or anything the EMFs hit. The SAR only considered the end use devices and left out the Wi-Fi Router bathing the classroom putting children as well as teachers in the circuit. The wireless smart grid required to communicate with smart meters wasn’t used in the SAR. All of that makes the test baseless science and the RF EMFs are a biological or frequency weapon as applied.

It was during cross examination of a utility’s “experts” that they admitted covering their 17,000 sq. kms with RF EMFs to communicate with smart meters. The Specific Absorption Rate test adopted by Canada, FCC and others left it out as well as the bio electrical information. That makes it baseless and dangerous garbage science.

People have heard of Chernobyl, Fukushima? That radiation is different from the RF EMFs, it is electromagnetic radiation but still radiation. Blanket radiation is radiating EVERYTHING in the coverage areas. It will genetically modify genetically modified food and will gentically modify everything in the coverage areas. That is separate of radiating buildings, nuclear power plants, infrastructure but they didn’t tell engineers, biologists, education, municipalities or their insurers.

Governments and industry were informed causation was found and reported linking the frequencies to adverse health effects. Dismissing it will not alleviate the liability or damage. An opt out means nothing, you will still be radiated regardless of who you are. Take it personally, exposure is based on an adult male for 6 minutes. Your children are being radiated in schools all day and governments determined 24/7 exposure is ok with smart meters. Imagine grading children on their intelligence while we neurologically stimulate them and cause damage measurable by the second. FortisBC, other utilities, governments, lobbyists and unqualified people refer to wireless smart meters transmitting for minutes a day. The grid is on and exposure is 24/7.